Skip to main content

Adam Smith Philosophy, Wealth of Nations Theory

Adam Smith Philosophy, Wealth of Nations Theory

Scottish great thinker Adam Smith (1723-1790), was a philosopher of economics, morals and politics. His lectures on ethics and logic were published under Theory of the Moral Sentiments (1759,) but in economic history, Smith is best known for his work on political economics, The Wealth of Nations (1776.) He was a contemporary of philosopher David Hume.

Philosophy of Adam Smith

Adam Smith is famous for his principle that says, “unintended consequences of intended action benefits the society as a while.” He is also famous for his views in the free market economy and on private property. He was a favoured philosopher of Britain’s former prime minister Margaret Thatcher and the Conservative economists.

His doctrine is illustrated as follows: Suppose that Carl Boyle is seeking his own fortune. In pursuing this, he decides to set-up and run his own manufacturing business. He produces some common items of everyday need. Although he seeks only to provide for his own fortune, his business enterprise has a number of unintentional benefits to others. Here are two:

  • First, he provides livelihood for the people he employs, which benefits them directly.
  • Second, he makes more readily available common items which previously has been more difficult or more expensive to obtain for his customers, therefore easing some aspect of their lives.

As a result, the market economy driving forces make sure that these unintentional benefits occur, for if Boyle’s workers find more profitable employment elsewhere they would either resign working for Boyle or he would have to raise their salaries to keep his employees.

Likewise, if Boyle’s product is not readily available or more expensive compared to competitors, he would either be forced to close his business or to lower his prices to a competitive rate.

This illustrative model assumes the absence of a monopoly, both in the labour and economic markets.

Effect of Adam Smith’s Philosophical Theory

Smith’s “unintended consequences of intended action” held great imaginative power over the 18th and 19th centuries industrial philanthropists that later provided the philosophical groundwork for the ethical theories of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill.

But any philosophy or principle is not exempt from criticism. One needs only revisit the social history of industrial Britain to witness the dangerous exploitative working practices of the industrial age. The extreme poverty and degrading social conditions of the poor working classes are sufficient to encapsulate Smith’s idealistic model which has had far more serious “unintended” consequences.

What has apparently brought an end to such conditions in the industrialized West is not necessarily an adherence to Smith’s principles, but rather, a shift of the poverty and exploitative working practices from one part of the world to another, that is, the living conditions on the West has improved to the detriment of other countries, mainly, the Third World, in terms of labour required to support the economic philosophy of Smith.

Insight on Adam Smith’s Philosophy

Regardless of one’s political views on Adam Smith, his doctrine The Wealth of Nations is one of the most important and deservedly read works of economic and political philosophy in the history of Western thought. Smith argued that a free trade and laissez-faire economy would stimulate production, therefore, acting in the interest of the public, but he also recognized the necessity for moral and legal restrictions.

Sources:

McGovern, Una, Editor. Biographical Dictionary, 7th Ed. Edinburgh: Chambers,

Stokes, Philip. Philosophy, The Great Thinkers. London: Capella,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Haunted Beardslee Castle Ghosts and Other Paranormal Activity

Built on haunted Mohawk Valley ground, Beardslee Castle , now a restaurant, has ghosts, poltergeist activity and other inexplicable events. When Augustus and Lavina Beardslee were on a European vacation in the early 1860s, she fell in love with the castles, especially an Irish one. He hired an architect to create a copy of that castle, then brought back the blueprints and Irish stone masons to build it in the Mohawk Valley on land that had already seen its share of tragedy. Also read How to Detect Paranormal Activity One-hundred years earlier, during the French and Indian War, the land housed a French homestead or fort, according to varying references, filled with ammunition. A band of AmerIndians slipped into the fort and accidentally blew it up when sparks from their torches ignited gun powder. Beardslee Castle was the scene of subsequent tragedies. The building and its grounds are haunted. Ghosts of Beardslee Castle People have sensed a strong AmerIndian presence on the grounds and ...

Aries horoscope love compatibility

HOROSCOPE LOVE COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN ARIES AND ARIES ARIES AND ARIES:   it may be an intense love affair, but neither of the 2 Aries is satisfied with not having the lead. The Aries female objectively tends to dominate. Yet, Aries male too. Therefore there will be a big opposition to be number one, at least during the first days of the relationship. In the bedroom too, both Aries will engage a fierce struggle to dominate the other. The relationship between two Aries may be good though if each has outside interests and/or a career separate from the other. As a matter of a fact, when their energies are not always in the same room and when each partner can satisfy the natural Aries’ will to dominate, the relationship between two Aries is intensely passionate and less destructive. HOROSCOPE LOVE COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN ARIES AND TAURUS ARIES AND TAURUS:   That’s a difficult match. Taurus likes to stay at home, is possessive and jealous, characteristics highly conflicting with Aries’...

Purebred Dogs - What, me resemble my dog?

Purebred Dogs - What, me resemble my dog?  More than meets the eye…. We’ve all seen those articles that infer that a dog owner begins to take on the outward appearance of their dog. I for one, feel I have little physically in common with my dog (a KBT). I’m sure you would agree this premise does not have enough documentation! Certainly I did not choose Maggie because she would resemble me! People own dogs for different reasons and in an earlier article I dealt with choosing your pet based on exercise time, training time, home alone time, grooming time, and physical attributes. Now I’d like to look at the less objective reasons for dog ownership. Are dog owners of the same breed similar? Do you fit the profile of other owners for your breed? Check How dogs and their Owner’s Personalities are Similar where significant research is posted on the similarities among owners of same breeds as compared to other dog breed owners. This site is worth a visit if you own, or if you are...